Or did the author leave us hanging, wondering what happened?
Or did the author leave us hanging, wondering what happened?Tags: Wuthering Heights Outline EssaysMethodology In A DissertationCompare And Contrast Paintings EssayThesis Is OverratedBusiness Ethic EssayPuzzle Piece Mystery Book Report ProjectEssay Questions PoemFinal Year Dissertation
Reading good critiques may help a newbie learn that a pro offers objective advice about more tangible problems (character development, grammar, advancing the plot, use of dialogue)." - Anthony Boyd Consider the target readers.
Do you as a critic have a good idea of the type of readers this author was writing for? If you have some experience or knowledge that is very relevant to a comment of yours, you might mention it.
Was the story captivating from the very first few paragraphs? To just bash the story without providing something useful to the author is not really being professional. When you give an example of a better way to do what you pointed out, you make your point much clearer to the author. As [critics], don't we have a responsibility to not only point out what needs changing, as we see it, but also what worked and why, so the writer WON'T change it and will be encouraged to produce more of the same? Don't we often base our decision to buy or not buy upon those first few sentences? By conflict, I do not mean lots of slam-bam action. Did they have the potential to transform each other?
Do you think that the story or book has sales potential? Remember, the purpose of writing a critique is twofold: (1) identify the weaknesses in the piece and (2) offer some constructive advice to the author that might lead to improvement in the story. Why should all the mistakes find their targets, but the successes meet with only silence--leaving the poor writer, who has poured out her/his heart, with nothing but: no, no, no, ... We cannot grow, otherwise." - Pete Murphy "I think there's a sometimes overlooked purpose in critiquing and that is to identify the strengths in a story as well, to offer encouragement and positive reinforcement in regard to those strengths, thereby preventing the possibility that the author will change, for the worse, those things that make the story good." - Debra Littlejohn Shinder Opening Do the first few sentences or paragraphs of the story grab your attention? Remember how you judge a book or story when you first see it in a bookstore. Until the end, of course, when all the conflicts should be resolved. Is it expressed through action, dialogue, attitudes, or values? Or did they seem to be totally satisfied with their roles?
Were there so many such errors that they made reading the piece difficult for you? For example, I once wrote "fruits of mother nature" and "thoughts burning in his mind", both of which are cliches.
In dialogue cliches are okay if the character would speak that way. For instance, I once wrote: "With tears in her eyes and barely able to speak, the head nurse dialed the Chief of Staff.
Were the facts about the characters accurate and consistent?
"It's very important in building characters to make sure your 'facts' are accurate and consistent.
If you mention in chapter two that your sister's birth sign is Leo, and then in chapter twelve, you have her celebrating her birthday during a snowfall (unless she lives at the north pole [or in the southern hemisphere]), credibility will be lost.
Even if the reader doesn't key in on exactly 'what' is wrong with the picture, he/she will have a disquieting sense that 'something' is." - Debra Littlejohn Shinder Backstory: Were you distracted by too much background information of a character at one time?