Hitler and Stalin each rose to the highest position attainable in their respective countries, and there were three main reasons that they were able to do this.
Both men were skilled users of propaganda, each was amoral, and they both had the ambition to make their countries powerful in the world.
It is often asked, whether Stalin’s Soviet Union or Hitler’s Germany was morally worse.
In this essay, I will argue that while Stalin’s atrocities cannot ever be justified, Hitler’s actions were morally worse, because Adolf Hitler was an ideologue, unlike Joseph Stalin. An ideologue is someone who blindly adheres to one particular ideology.
Their success was mostly attributed to their new ideas and their politics.
Although Hitler and Stalin hated each other, the two leaders were similar in many ways.
During the period leading up to World War II, there were two men who were on opposing sides, the men were Adolph Hitler and Joseph Stalin.
These men were each triumphant in their rise to power in their countries and they were very comparable in the ways that they succeeded.
In modern times, we generally associate this word with negative connotations, although this does not have to be this way.
Mahatma Gandhi was an ideologue, he adhered to the idea of non-violence. Hitler’s whole political career was shaped around the ideology of Nazism, which was embroiled in xenophobia, anti-Semitism and fascism.