A typical research paper follows the IMRa D format, and how frequently a given tense is used varies with the section of the paper: the introduction, for example, uses a mix of the present tense and the past tense whereas the past tense dominates the results section. ‘We selected 5 plants at random.’ ‘Tanaka reported that 1000 grains of wheat weighed 40 grams.’ ‘Watson and Crick published their landmark paper on the structure of DNA in 1953.’2.
A typical research paper follows the IMRa D format, and how frequently a given tense is used varies with the section of the paper: the introduction, for example, uses a mix of the present tense and the past tense whereas the past tense dominates the results section. ‘We selected 5 plants at random.’ ‘Tanaka reported that 1000 grains of wheat weighed 40 grams.’ ‘Watson and Crick published their landmark paper on the structure of DNA in 1953.’2.Here is a brief guide to using the four variants, namely simple past, simple present, present perfect, and past perfect. Simple present: Use simple present for stating what is generally true and unlikely to change, as in ‘The sun rises in the east,’ ‘Human babies generally start speaking when they are two years old’, and ‘In July and August, it rains in most parts of India.’ Use simple present also to indicate research results that you believe to be true and relevant to your present research, as in ‘Robinson maintains that soaking seeds in strong acids help in breaking seed dormancy.’ Lastly, simple present is used when talking about the research paper that you are writing, as in ‘Section 2.3 discusses the advantages of soaking seeds before sowing them.’3.Tags: Are Research Papers Opinion BasedHenry Ford Research PaperEssay Writers.ComMsc Dissertation WritingIran Revolution EssaysWhat Is The Purpose Of Writing A Conclusion In A Lab ReportBusiness Law Research PaperThesis On Employee LoyaltyOrganizational Behavior Term Paper
To know the inside, you have to know the inside and the outside; retaining is always a repetition.
You have to know that there is an inside and an outside, that works of art are “works of art” because they try to follow their own logic: they exist in their own present tense, so to speak.
The now of art authorizes, eventually, the past tense; the commitment to the discipline of literary analysis makes possible historical judgment.
There are a lot of versions of this argument, which usually filter through Kant and Hegel in a dizzying range of possibilities.
The logic and practice of the discipline for which you write determine verb tense.
If you have questions about tense or other writing concerns, check with your professor.
The following chart shows twelve forms of the verb "to write" that result from combining time with aspect. (The leg is still broken or otherwise affects my current condition.) I acted for 10 years.
verbs: add "n", "t", "ought", etc., ex: The written word is mute until read. (This implies I no longer act.) I have acted for 10 years. Academic writing generally concerns writing about research.
Adorno is no naïve New Critic (were there naïve New Critics? The line between inside and outside is exactly the problem he is posing for himself; he sounds much like Derrida’s reading of the “parergon” in Kant’s Critique of Judgment.
Adorno is posing the question of the inside and the outside, the question of the system and its limit, by insisting that the social—the outside, the world of production, the world of divisions of labor, the world of class, the world of history—only becomes apparent through the inside, through the work of art, as the work (here, the lyric poem) tries to pursue its own logic, its own totality, its own present tense.