Some of the differences among these countries include how they treat adoption (e.g., whether international adoptions are permitted), taxes, pension benefits, citizenship (whether at least one of the individuals entering into the relationship must be a citizen of the country recognizing the status), and the presumption of parenthood (whether a child born into the relationship will be presumed to be the child of both adults).A separate issue is whether families involving samesex couples will be recognized on a subnational level.On the other hand, Americans believes that marriage is gift from God and means that couples are combined in one.Tags: Oliver Cromwell Essay QuestionsPsychology Research Paper Thesis StatementsReally Good Thesis StatementsEssay About My Best TeacherEssays About Teaching SThesis On Hitler YouthArt Essay LifeThesis Statement For Hills Like White Elephants
For those who choose to marry, and for their children, marriage also provides an abundance of legal, financial, and social benefits.
In return it imposes weighty legal, financial, and social obligations (see 2003).
Thus, relationships or incidents of relationships might be recognized in a particular city or region, even if they are not recognized nationally.
For example, Buenos Aires recognizes civil unions, even though Argentina has not yet decided to do so, and New South Wales, Australia, has legislation regarding how property should be distributed upon the dissolution of a same-sex relationship, even though that is not true for all of Australia.
(Susana) Wai Ha Fok EN114 Marriage Traditions: Vast difference There is a huge difference between Chinese and western culture in marriage traditions.
Due to the different background of religions, histories, also the evolution of thought and custom, meanings behind the marriage and wedding routines are vary.
As of mid-2006, only Massachusetts recognized same-sex marriage.
Regardless of how the relationship is designated by the state, same-sex couples are not entitled to the numerous federal benefits that are accorded to different-sex married couples, because the U. Congress passed legislation in 1996 (the Defense of Marriage Act) specifying that only a marriage between a man and a woman will count as a marriage for federal purposes.
Many of its supporters, whether or not they self-identify as part of the Religious Right, cite religious reasons as their justification—for example, by suggesting that God did not intend for same-sex couples to be able to marry.
Other supporters worry that recognition of samesex marriages would be too costly to the state or would somehow devalue different-sex marriage.