Remember to adhere always to the “golden rule” of peer reviewing (M.
At this point, it’s a good idea to take a few days away from the paper to step back from the details for a while.
During the third and final reading, you should concentrate on the writing and presentation.
Don’t just note, “This is badly written.” Suggest to the authors how to make the story more cohesive and tightly reasoned.
Was the paper hard to read because the paragraphs did not flow together?
Ask the following questions: • Do the Abstract and Introduction clearly identify the need for this research, and its relevance?
Narrative Essay Outline Examples - Writing A Review Paper
• Does the Methodology target the main question(s) appropriately?
The full peer-review document can comprise the following sections: 1. Reading it this way will also draw your attention to how your criticisms might sound to the ears of the authors. Naturalist 173, E155–E158; 2009): “review for others as you would have others review for you”. This is an article from the Nature Careers Community, a place for Nature readers to share their professional experiences and advice. You can get in touch with the editor at [email protected]
Introduction: Mirror the article, state your expertise and whether the paper is publishable, or whether there are fatal flaws; 2. Ensure that your critiques are constructive and not offensive. Sometimes, you should submit a harsh review, but never a rude one.
In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and Java Script.
Scientists do not receive enough peer-review training.